Skip to main content

Table 4 Use of GGBS for forming SRS

From: Reutilization of solid wastes to improve the hydromechanical and mechanical behaviors of soils — a state-of-the-art review

Reference

Soil

Treatment

Treatment content

Tests

Effects of treatment

Primary mechanism

Remarksa

Singhi et al. [53]

Clayey soil

GGBS; FA; alkali activators

4–20% (GGBS/ FA or combination both)

UCS

Increases UCS

Cementation of hydration products

UCS increases with the increase in GGBS and FA content

Yi et al. [35]

Sand; Clayey silt

GGBS; activators (reactive magnesia, brucite, and hydrated lime)

5% and 10% (GGBS for the sand); 10% and 20% (GGBS for the clayey silt); 0.05–0.40 (activators/GGBS)

UCS; XRD; SEM

Increases UCS

Cementation of hydration products

Reactive magnesia yields the highest activating efficiency

Sharma and Sivapullauah [54]

Expansive soil

GGBS; FA

70:30 (GGBS: FA); 10–40% (GGBS-FA mixture)

Atterberg limit; UCS; SEM; XRD

Increases UCS and MDD and decreases swelling potential, liquid and plastic limits, and OMC

Cementation of hydration products

The optimum GGBS-FA content was 20%

Yi et al. [34]

Marine soft clay

GGBS; activators (NaOH, Na2CO3, and Na2SO4); carbide slag; cement

30% (GGBS and cement); 0.1 (Carbide slag/GGBS)

UCS; XRD; SEM; MIP

Enhances the strength development rate

Cementation of hydration products

Na2SO4-carbide slag-GGBS was found to be the optimum binder

Yi et al. [36]

Marine clay

GGBS; activators (quick lime and hydrated lime)

20% (GGBS); 0.05–0.40 (Quick lime and hydrated lime/GGBS)

UCS; XRD; SEM; MIP

Increases UCS

Cementation of hydration products

The optimum lime/GGBS ratio was 0.2 at 7 and 28 curing days, and 0.10 at 90 curing days

  1. aUnder the studied conditions