Table 4 Predicted probability of occurrence of changes in waste disposal/use behavior due to changes in respondent demographic characteristics
From: Food waste supply and behaviour towards its alternative uses in Kampala city, Uganda
Dependent Variable | Independent Variables | Logit Statistics | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | S.E | Wald χ2 | df | Sig (P = 0.05) | Odds ratio | Model evaluation | ||
Households | ||||||||
Re-use of food waste | Marital status (Divorced) | -2.33 | 1.01 | 5.27 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.10 | • X2 (21, N = 209) = 47.44, p = 0.001 • Nagelkerke R2 = 27.1 • Correct cases (%) = 68.40 |
Earning an income | -0.59 | 0.22 | 7.37 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 0.56 | ||
Main occupation (Business) | -2.76 | 1.31 | 4.41 | 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.06 | ||
Main occupation (Un-employed) | -3.00 | 1.37 | 4.79 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.05 | ||
Disposal at a fee | Rooms house | 0.29 | 0.11 | 7.08 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 1.33 | • X2 (21, N = 209) = 35.21, p = 0.027 • Nagelkerke R2 = 20.9 • Correct cases (%) = 58.90 |
Food waste is a problem | Education level (None) | 5.57 | 1.75 | 10.08 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 262.54 | X2 (21, N = 209) = 75.47, p = < 0.0001 • Nagelkerke R2 = 45.2 • Correct cases (%) = 80.90 |
Education level (Primary) | 2.76 | 1.06 | 6.79 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 15.72 | ||
Education level (Secondary) | 2.14 | 0.90 | 5.67 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 8.53 | ||
Number of schooling years | 0.23 | 0.08 | 8.91 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.26 | ||
Willingness to give away Food waste at no charge | Marital status (married) | -1.86 | 0.91 | 4.18 | 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.16 | • X2 (21, N = 209) = 33.67, p = < 0.039 • Nagelkerke R2 = 45.2 • Correct cases (%) = 24.80 |
Thinking that food waste has benefits | Education level (None) | 8.86 | 2.54 | 12.18 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 7027.67 | • X2 (21, N = 209) = 137.77, p = < 0.0001 • Nagelkerke R2 = 68.90 • Correct cases (%) = 70.80 |
Education level (Primary) | 6.02 | 1.66 | 13.10 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 411.38 | ||
Education level (Secondary) | 4.89 | 1.51 | 10.46 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 132.81 | ||
Marital status (Married) | 5.09 | 1.84 | 7.67 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 162.98 | ||
Marital status (Single) | 5.63 | 1.93 | 8.54 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 278.01 | ||
Marital status (Divorced) | 4.02 | 1.83 | 4.80 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 55.45 | ||
Number of schooling years | 0.27 | 0.10 | 6.63 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 1.31 | ||
Main occupation (Un-employed) | 3.38 | 1.45 | 5.42 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 29.26 | ||
Institutions | ||||||||
Willingness to give away Food waste at no charge | Existence period (5–10 years) | -4.15 | 1.72 | 5.86 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.02 | • X2 (14, N = 92) = 26.45, p = < 0.023 • Nagelkerke R2 = 36.6 • Correct cases (%) = 73.90 |
Disposal at a fee | Education level (None) | 11.25 | 3.23 | 12.15 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 76,611.71 | • X2 (14, N = 92) = 30.97, p = < 0.006 • Nagelkerke R2 = 38.5 • Correct cases (%) = 77.20 |
Education level (Primary) | 5.11 | 1.81 | 7.97 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 164.82 | ||
Education level (Secondary) | 3.74 | 1.14 | 10.78 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 42.20 | ||
Number of schooling years | 0.47 | 0.16 | 8.78 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.60 | ||
Re-use of food waste | Education level (None) | -5.88 | 2.71 | 4.73 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | • X2 (14, N = 92) = 30.97, p = < 0.019 • Nagelkerke R2 = 25.6 • Correct cases (%) = 71.7 |
Education level (Primary) | -4.43 | 1.77 | 6.27 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
Education level (Secondary) | -2.44 | 0.99 | 6.06 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 0.09 | ||