Investigating the bacterial consortia properties of electrogenic anodic biofilm in a double-chamber microbial fuel cell: electrochemical, physical, biochemical and molecular characterization

This work evaluated the electrochemical, physical, biochemical, and molecular characterization of electrogens from a graphite felt anode when zinc oxide on activated carbon (ZnO/AC) was used as a cathodic electrocatalyst in a double‑chambered microbial fuel cell (DCMFC). The electrochemical polarization behavior of the DCMFC showed that ZnO/AC had a higher power density (PD max ) of 89 mW m −2 with a corresponding cell current density (CD) of 248 mA m −2 and a voltage output of 395 mV, which was higher than those of the blank electrode used as a benchmark (PD max of 68 mW m −2 at a CD of 161 mA m −2 and a voltage of 421 mV). Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy revealed that the morphology and interior properties of the strains varied among the rods (bacilli), spirals (vibrios), and spheres (diplococci, staphylococci and streptococci). In addition, bio‑ chemical characterization via the Vitek2 compact system and molecular analysis via 16 S rRNA and 18 S rRNA gene sequencing revealed the occurrence of nine prevalent species that were correlated with Sphingobacterium spiritivo-rum, Ochrobactrum anthropicus, Pseudomonas mendocina, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Staphylococcus equorum, Bacillus subtilis HQ334981.1, Kocuria kristinae KC581674.1 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae NR111007.1. Consequently, the present study outlines different characterization strategies for electrogenic microbes that play an important role in the overall performance of DCMFC for scaling up and managing existing environmental pollution for sustainable energy generation.


Introduction
Organic pollutants, toxic components, and heavy metal effluents can lead to impurities in water [1].Consequently, sustainable treatment methods are needed for water recovery and reuse [2].Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are suitable for transforming waste directly into electricity through the biochemical process of electrogenic microbes [3].MFCs allow microorganisms to harvest the electric energy from organic matter by converting the chemical energy stored in pollutants into bioelectricity with high removal rates [4].The electrons released from the oxidation process are transported into the anode via conductive protein complexes and nanowires [5].The transfer of electrons between the anode and microbes occurs either by extracellular transfer [6] or by intuitively or synthetically formed redox shuttles [7].A combination of electrochemical, phylogenetic, and genomic techniques offers opportunities in determining the composition of electroactive species, a better understanding of the extracellular electron transfer process, which in turn can lead to optimization for power output [8].Thus, necessary techniques are needed to give researchers a view of the appropriate methods.Therefore, physical techniques such as images from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) suggest the chance to recognize and understand the morphology and interior properties of the electrogenic microbes that were previously too hard to be gained by regular techniques.They can introduce evidence that the direct electron transfer (DET) out electrogen cells into insoluble solid phases by highly conductive nanowires or via membrane-bound c-type cytochrome [9].Furthermore, biochemical analyses offer the difference between Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, electrogenic and performance activity, and electron transfer via endogenous redox-active metabolites.Also, genomic techniques such as 16 S rRNA provided important information on the structure, metabolic pathway, and genetic potential of colonized biofilm.Moreover, population dynamics is an important indicator of electrochemical activity and biochemical processes [10].
The power generation of an applied MFC is related to several factors, such as the reactor configuration, electrogenic microbes, electrode material, electron donors, separator (such as proton exchange membrane, PEM), and electron acceptors.A typical MFC consists of anodic and cathodic chambers.Classically, the anode section is preserved underneath an anaerobic environment to reduce the influence of oxygen damage on the electrogens and decrease the columbic efficiency.Nevertheless, single-chamber MFCs have a simple and lowcost setup, they have numerous boundaries due to the absence of a membrane in their configuration, including substrate depletion at the cathode and oxygen diffusion to the anode surface, resulting in the competition of O 2 with the anodic electrogenic microbes to accept the produced electrons from the oxidation of the organic substrate, resulting in lowering of bioelectrocatalytic activity of electrogenic, electron recovery, and columbic efficiency [11,12].In this regard, dual-chamber MFC configurations have the prospective to overwhelm these boundaries, according to the existence of an ion-selective separator.
There are numerous compensatory effects of electricigens, such as high efficiency, long stability, and DET.They have been found in a variety of different and complex habitats, including municipal wastewater, salt water, soils and sediments.For example, Shewanella putrificans [13], Geobacter metallireducens [14], Geobacteraceae sulferreducens [15] and Rhodoferax ferrireducens [16].Electrogenic microbes, as pure mixtures of indigenous and engineered artificial bacteria, have been used as anode bioelectrocatalysts [17].The electron donors used for fuel vary from simple organic substrates such as acetate or complex organic pollutants such as wastewater [18].
Economically, MFCs have not yet been established due to the decreased power yields.The power yields are approximately 54 mW m −3 for urban wastewater [19] and range from 250 to 500 mW m −2 for wastewater [20].To optimize the performance of MFCs, electrode materials must be relatively inexpensive, highly conductive, and have a large surface area [21].Modification of transition metal oxides (e.g., SnO 2 , Cu 2 O, ZnO, TiO 2 , CeO 2 , and CO) has attracted significant attention owing to its ability to reduce electrons on cathodic surfaces.
Based on the above description, the foremost objective of the present study was to determine the selection of microbes from a mixed culture that can grow on the anodic carbon felt surface to generate electricity in a double chambered microbial fuel cell (DCMFC) by using zinc oxide supported on activated carbon (ZnO/AC) as a cathodic electrocatalyst.Furthermore, the electricigens were characterized electrochemically by studying the polarization behavior of DCMFCs, and physically by using SEM and TEM.Finally, the electricigen community structures were further identified biochemically by the Vitek2 compact system and molecularly using 16 S rRNA and 18 S rRNA gene nucleotide sequencing analysis.This paper evaluates the use of different characterization approaches for electricigen microbes as biocatalysts for assessing the development of DCMFCs on a large scale for sustainable energy generation.

DCMFC configuration
Two DCMFCs were assembled by connecting two cylindrical chambers cathodic and anodic chambers.All the bioreactors had a PEM with a diameter of 6 cm between the cathodes and anodes.The carbon felt anodes were three-dimensional (Fuel Cell Store, TX, USA) with an estimated active surface area of approximately 19.5 cm 2 .The cathodes were made of a non-wet proof carbon cloth with a microporous layer (active surface area equal to 16.6 cm 2 ).The electrodes of the bioreactors were connected with stainless steel wires for electron transfer.

Preparation of the cathodic electrode
ZnO/AC with a mass loading of 0.3 mg cm −2 was prepared as previously described [22].First, the ZnO/AC powder was mixed well with a 5% Nafion solution.Then, the resultant mixture was sonicated at 60 °C for 30 min.Afterward, the paste was uniformly distributed on the surface of the carbon cloth electrode.Finally, the cathodic electrode was allowed to dry at room temperature for 24 h before starting the MFC studies.Blank carbon cloth without any modification was used in another DCMFC as a benchmark for comparison.

Electrochemical analysis
DCMFCs functioned primarily at an open-circuit cell voltage for three cycles.Subsequently, the system was closed by a 10 kΩ resistor to achieve a steady voltage, sustainable performance of anodic electrogenic microbes in a longterm operation and to select Proteobacteria phylum that can perform anode respiration for electricity generation [23,24].A data acquisition system (USB 6000 12 -BIT 10 KS/S Multifunction I/O as well as NI -DAQMX Software) connected to a personal computer for measuring the produced voltage every 5 min.Afterthought, the power and polarization curves were obtained by fluctuating the external loads from 470 kΩ to 240 Ω.

Performance of DCMF analyses
The chemical oxygen demand removal efficiency (COD removal (%)) was calculated as (1) where COD initial and COD final are the influent and effluent concentrations (mg L −1 ), respectively, at the end of the DCMFC batch cycles [25].
The coulombic efficiency (C E ) expresses the charge efficiency in which electrons are being transferred in the DCMFC.It was determined by integrating the generated current with the theoretical current as follows: where CP is the Coulombs equivalent to the actual current produced during one batch cycle (Coulomb, C).CT is the theoretical coulombs (Coulomb, C) and is estimated according to the following formula: CT = (F × N × W × V)/M), where F is Faraday's constant (96,485 C mol −1 ), N is number of moles of electrons (8 mol mol −1 ), W is the daily COD load removed (g L −1 ), M is the molecular weight of acetate (59 g mol −1 ), and V is the medium volume (100 mL) [26].

Physical analyses of biofilms
The interior morphology of the isolated strains was studied using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM).Therefore, the formed anodic biofilm was removed and envisioned after batch cycles to confirm the role of the anodic biofilm in electricity liberation using previously described standard processes [27].

Biochemical and molecular analyses of isolated strains
The isolated biomass on anodic carbon felt was harvested at the end of the batch cycles of DCMFC.Then, the cells were placed in a flask containing 90 mL of phosphate buffer solution.After that, the flask was stirred for 2 h, and the solutions were diluted to 1 × 10 −7 .The facultative anaerobic bacteria were isolated using sterile sodium thioglycollate agar (1.5 KH 2 PO 4 , 0.5 cysteine HCl, 5.0 yeast extract, 15.0 peptone, 3.0 sodium acetate, 5.5 glucose, 0.001 sodium resazurin, 20 agar, 0.5 sodium thioglycollate, 2.5 NaCl, and 2.0 K 2 HPO 4 g L −1 ).For 3 d, the plates were incubated at 37 ± 2.0 °C for colony-forming units (CFU) in the selected petri dishes.Plate count agar (PCA) medium was used to isolate aerobic bacteria, which were incubated at 28 ± 2.0-48 h.To isolate the yeast strains, media containing 10% glucose, 3% yeast extract, 0.6% NaH 2 PO 4 , 0.2% NH 4 Cl, and 0.05% MnSO 4 g L −1 were used at pH = 6.3.For the CFUs, the selected Petri dishes were incubated at 28-30 ± 2.0 °C for 48 h.To confirm their purity, the former colonies were picked and spread onto the same media.

Biochemical characterization by vitek2
Six isolated electricigens were identified by the Biomeriux VITEK 2 (2) compact method [28].The isolated strains were transported and mixed well by a sterilized swab into a polystyrene test tube containing 3 mL of sterile saline.To adjust the turbidity, a VITEK ® 2 DensiCHEK ™ turbidity meter was used.The microbe biomass was retained in a cassette and subsequently placed into a vacuum chamber station.The obtained data were collected, and a special algorithm was used to exclude incorrect interpretations.Finally, the results were automatically obtained and recorded after 10 h, as previously mentioned [29].
16 S rRNA and 18 S rRNA gene sequencing Three unidentified microbes by the vitek2 compact method were cultured in sterile plant tubes containing specific media (PCA) and incubated before being sent to Macrogen ® (Korea) for molecular identification by 16 S rRNA and 18 S rRNA gene sequencing.The DNA of the particular isolates was used as a template for Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) with the three primer pairs shown in Table 1.PCR amplification was performed with a Gene Amp 2400 PCR system according to the following program: first, denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min for each denaturation for 1 min; second, annealing at for 1 min; and extension at 72 °C for 2 min.The extension of the primer segment was prolonged at 72 °C for 5 min in the final round.Consequently, the PCR products were resolved via electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose gel at 80 V for 1 h with 1X Tris base, Acetic acid and EDTA buffer and then stained with ethidium bromide solution for approximately 10-15 min.
The amplified fragments were examined via visualization under a UV trans illuminator.The PCR products were amplified from the DNA extracts of the isolates, purified, and sequenced using the ABI PRISM (BigDy-eTM Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit).Single-pass sequencing was performed on each template using identical primer pairs according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer.The samples were resuspended in distilled water and subjected to electrophoresis in a sequencer (ABI 3730xl).The microbial isolate sequences of DNA (labeled Sh-02, Sh-07 and Sh-05) were subsequently associated with the universal isolate nucleotide sequences collected from http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, using the DNASTAR Software Package-Laser Gene (Expert Sequence Analysis Software, USA) and the MEGA Align database.

Attachment and biomass assay
The previously identified strains were tested for biomass and biofilm formation according to a previously described method [30].The wells of a sterile 96-well polystyrene microplate (Brand, Wertheim, Germany) were filled with 150 µL aliquots of prepared suspension culture and fresh Luria-Bertani (LB) broth.Then, the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h.Thereafter, using an ELISA reader (Thermo Scientific Multiskan FC, USA) and a computer with evaluation software, the biomass concentration was estimated by optical density measurement at OD 600 nm.Subsequently, the content of each well was removed by aspiration, and the samples were rinsed three times with 250 µL of sterile distilled water.The attached bacteria were fixed with 200 µL of methanol for 15 min, emptied, and dried at room temperature.Afterward, 200 µL of a 5% (v/v) crystal violet solution (Fluka) was added to each well and held at ambient temperature for 15 min.Later, the plate was placed under gently running tap water to remove the excess stain.To release the stain from adherent cells, 33% (v/v) glacial acetic acid was added.Biofilm formation was measured using an ELISA reader at an OD570.

Stability of DCMFCs
DCMFCs were assessed in fed-batch mode to promote the dynamic acclimation of mature electrogenic anodic biofilms using acetate as fuel and ZnO/AC as a cathodic electrocatalyst in comparison to blank cathodic electrodes.Figure 1a shows that the measured open circuit potentials (OCVs) increased over three consecutive Table 1 The nucleotide sequences of the primer pairs were used for the molecular identification of electricigens   with acetate breakdown by electricigens and an increased reduction rate in the cathodic chamber using the electroactive catalyst ZnO/AC, resulting in a lower COD value.Moreover, the C Es over three cycles were greater for ZnO/AC (52, 41, and 30) than for the blank (16, 13 and 11).Consequently, an inverse relationship between C E and substrate concentration was established.

Polarization and power outputs
The illustrative corresponding power density and steadystate polarization characteristic plots for ZnO/AC and blank DCMFC were elaborated by applying different external resistances fluctuating from 470 kΩ to 240 Ω in reducing order stepwise after the MFC was operated stably.As shown in Fig. 1d, when the current density was 248 mA m −2 and the consistent voltage output was 395 mV, the PD max was 89 mW m −2 for ZnO/AC.On the other hand, the blank cathode generated a high power density of 68 mW m −2 at a cell current density of 161 mA m −2 and a corresponding voltage output of 421 mV.Furthermore, the internal resistance (R in ) was calculated and was approximately lower for ZnO/AC (1.3 kΩ ) than for the blank (1.5 kΩ).This difference might be due to the electron-transfer kinetics of the oxygen reduction on the ZnO/AC cathode.As illustrated in Table 2, these results exhibited greater power output performance than those done by Mathew and Thomas, in which a lower power density (7 mW m −2 ) was obtained from the DCMFC when PANI-ZnO was loaded on stainless steel mesh.However, using PANI-Cu/ZnO, a PD of 45 mW m −2 was achieved [32].Moreover, Tajdid Khajeh et al. evaluated CuO/ZnO-modified graphite plates in a DCMFC and reported a PD of 51 mW m −2 under visible light irradiation [33].In addition, the performance was lower than that of a previous study, which was performed by Dessie et al.They produced a PD of 506 mW m −2 when using α-MnO 2 /NiO/PANI as a cathodic electrocatalyst and Escherichia coli as an electroactive microorganism anodic electrocatalyst in DCMFCs [34].This variation in power density might be related to many variables, including the operating environment, MFC structure, anode type, surface area, microbial community variations, electron acceptors, PEM, changes in catalystsupporting components and their anticipated surface area.

Physical characterization of electroactive isolated biofilms 3.2.1 SEM analysis
From previous electrochemical studies, it could be assured that the mature electroactive anodic biofilm could oxidize acetate and liberate the produced electrons into the anodic electrode.After that, as illustrated in Fig. 2a, these liberated electrons were transferred into the cathode through an external resistor of 10 kΩ to generate electricity through the reduction of potassium permanganate as a catholyte in the presence of ZnO/AC as an electrocatalyst on the cathodic side.Hence, the physical characteristics of the isolated biofilm that was responsible for bioelectricity generation were visualized at the end of the operation (7 months) via SEM analysis.
This analysis was used to examine the morphologies of the plain carbon felt and the anodic biofilm that accumulated on the carbon-felt electrodes.As illustrated in Fig. 2b, the superficial morphology of the plain carbon felt was highly flat, with numerous carbon fibers overlapping one another to form a mesh-like structure.On the other hand, the morphological structure, cell attachment, topography, and distribution of the bacterial biofilm on the anodic carbon-felt surface are shown in Fig. 2c.The images showed the presence of rod, coccid, and clustered-shaped cells closely linked with the graphitic surface, approximately 0.9 to 2.1 μm long, which produced electricity owing to the presence of electrogenic biofilms.Furthermore, the anodic carbon felt was supposed to signify an appropriate place for the anaerobic augmentation of anodic biofilms.

TEM analysis
The interior structure and microbial physiology of the isolated electricigen communities from the surface of the anodic electrode that was responsible for bioelectricity generation were examined via TEM.The TEM images of isolates (donated as a to j) were illustrated in Fig. 3, which demonstrates how the ultrastructure of each isolate differed from that of the rod (bacilli) surface, as indicated in (Fig. 3a -e); spiral (vibrio) surface (Fig. 3f and g); and sphere surface that could be encapsulated by diplococci, staphylococci and streptococci (Fig. 3h and j).Furthermore, as shown in (Fig. 3f and g), there was a filamentous structure on the surface of spirals known as a nanowire (pili).Major cellular ultrastructural characteristics were also discovered in lipid membranes and the cytoplasm.
The lateral dimension thickness of the layers ranged from 200 nm to 1 μm.Based on the TEM analysis results of the present study, it could be assumed that the transfer of electrons from the respiratory chain of the microbe cell to an external electron acceptor surface (anode) was catalyzed by two direct major pathways, as illustrated in Fig. 4. The first pathway is DET, which occurs through physical interaction between a microbe's cell and anode without the contribution of any redox species [39].An additional form of DET is the conductive pili (nanowire).The second pathway involves mediated electron transfer (MET), which occurs via redox shuttles [40].

Biochemical identification using the vitek2 compact system method
The biochemical analysis using the Vitek2 compact system revealed the presence of six discrete foremost bacterial species that were classified as Gram-negative (four) or Gram-positive (two) as demonstrated in Table 3.The Gram-negative species were Sphingobacterium The S. maltophilia and O. thrapi species are facultatively anaerobic, motile by polar flagella and able to produce electricity through their flagellum (nanowire) [41].Previous research on the microbial electrochemical remediation of hydrocarbons revealed the prevalence of Stenotrophomonas spp.and their dominance in anodic microbial populations [42].S. spiritivorum and P. mendocina are facultative anaerobic, nonfermentative, nonmotile, nonspore-forming bacilli.These species were previously identified in anodic biofilm electrodes in MFCs [43].L. mesenteroides and S. equorum are facultatively anaerobic, streptococcal and grape-like cluster shapes, respectively.Previously, Flimban et al. reported that six species of Staphylococcus isolated from MFCs might be important in future biofuel research [44].However, there are no reports on the use of L. mesenteroides in MFCs.Additional research will be required to determine the role of this microorganism in determining its electrogenicity in the application of MFCs.Therefore, it could be concluded that biochemical analysis of anodic bacterial populations potential strategy for isolating electrochemically active bacterial microorganisms from activated sludge.

Molecular analysis by 16SrRNA
Three unidentified electricigen species by the Vitek2 compact system were molecularly identified based on the nucleotide sequences of the 16SrRNA and 18SrRNA genes.This analysis revealed the coexistence of two bacterial strains and one fungal isolate.Figure 5 illustrates the phylogenetic assessment of the unidentified isolated taxa at the genus level.Furthermore, the relative Fig. 3 TEM images of isolated electricigens from anodic biofilm proportions of three dominant electricigens that were associated with Bacillus subtilis HQ334981.1,Kocuria kristinae KC581674.1,and Saccharomyces cerevisiae NR111007.1 were determined.Based on the NCIB taxonomic database, the dynamics of the greatest relative abundances (%) of these microbial communities among phylogenetically related species were illustrated in Table 4.The highest relative abundances of B. subtilis HQ334981.1,K. kristinae KC581674.1,and S. cerevisiae NR111007.1 were 99%, 94%, and 95% respectively.
Based on both the Vitek2 compact system and molecular analysis of the 16SrRNA genes revealed the most prevalent Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, Ascomycota, and Actinobacteria taxa, which was similar to the findings of previous studies [45].Members of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes are well known to ferment polysaccharides (which act as fermentors) to provide metabolic constituents for electrogens [46].However, members of the Proteobacteria phylum can perform anode respiration.Thus, these isolated strains were correlated with the foremost species that were used for bioelectricity production in MFCs.By playing a vigorous character in the oxidation of sodium acetate and transfer of resulted electrons from their cell into the anodic carbon felt without the addition of an external mediator.Subsequently, reducing the internal resistance with increasing voltage output and subsequently achieving the highest power density [47].

Biomass concentration and biofilm formation
The previously identified strains (9 strains) were tested for biomass and biofilm formation in microtiter plate wells that were filled with 150 µl aliquots of prepared suspension culture and LB broth.As illustrated in Fig. 6a; Table 5, there was variation in biomass aggregation among all the strains at OD 600 nm compared with that of the negative control (NC) (0.16).Among the other tested strains, S. spiritivorum had the most biomass formation (1.96), followed by S. cerevisiae NR111007.1 (1.87), L. mesenteroides (1.86) and B. subtilus HQ334981.1 (1.84).Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 6b, variation in biofilm formation was measured at OD 570 nm values ranging from 0.15 to 0.31 for all the strains.K. Kristinae KC581674.1 provided the most biofilm formation (0.31), followed by S. equorum and P. mendosina, which had the same OD value (0.26).These findings demonstrated that the majority of the identified strains were able to form biofilms at a noteworthy level, which highlights the crucial importance of these microorganisms [48].In addition, biofilm formation begins with the initial attachment of the bacterium to a surface, followed by the formation of micro-colonies, which leads to the maturation of the micro-colonies into three-dimensional structures that are bound and alleviated by further polymeric substances (EPS) [49].required toward the mechanism of the liberation of electrons from electricigens cells toward the anode electrode and the development of DCMFCs for commercialization and pilot-scale application in sustainable energy generation and environmental pollution control.
GCA GCC GCG GTA ATA CG 800R TAC CAG GGT ATC TAA TCC Pair B 785 F GGA TTA GAT ACC CTG GTA 907R CCG TCA ATTCMTTT RAG TTT 18 S rRNA Pair C NS1 GTA GTC ATA TGC TTG TCT C NS24 AAA CCT TGT TAC GAC TTT TA cycles in the fed-batch.In the first operating cycle, the OCVs increased successively to values reaching 1.00 and 0.98 V after 7 and 4 d for the ZnO/AC and blank DCMFCs, respectively.Then, the voltage was gradually reduced according to the reduction in microbial cell viability at the end of each cycle for each DCMFC due to the consumption of acetate.Afterward, the anode chambers were inoculated with fresh media introduced after each cycle to revive the anodic electrode with active microorganisms and accelerate anodic biofilm formation each cycle.As a consequence, the OCVs increased again, reaching 1.07 and 1.03 V after 17 and 11 d of operation before the drop phase for the ZnO/AC and blank DCM-FCs, respectively.In the third operating cycle, the OCVs attained maximum stable values of 1.11 and 1.04 V after 23 and 7 d for the ZnO/AC and blank DCMFCs, respectively.It could be concluded that the OCV results might be attributed to the successful development of an electrogenic biofilm that improved voltage and electricity generation.

Figure
Figure1bdepicted the influence of 10 kΩ on the performance of DCMFCs at a preliminary concentration of sodium acetate (2 g L −1 ) in batch mode as an electron donor and KMnO 4 as an electron acceptor after 150 d.During three operating cycles, the closed-circuit voltages (CCVs) behaved in the same manner as the OCVs.In addition, the ZnO/AC-based DCMFC had a slightly greater maximum CCV output of 0.65 ± 0.06 V than that of the blank (0.58 ± 0.06 V).Hence, the performance of ZnO/AC-based DCMFCs was correlated with both anodic and cathodic electrocatalyst activities[31].The percentage of COD removal and C E during the progression of MFC operation at 10 kΩ and an initial COD of 1284 mg L −1 were shown in Fig.1c.The superior CODs were achieved over three closed cycles by approximately 87, 91 and 94% with decreasing COD concentration in the ZnO/AC-based DCMFC when compared to that of the blank cathode at 65, 72 and 81%, respectively.As a result, the ZnO/AC-based DCMFC behavior was correlated

Fig. 1 a
Fig. 1 a OCVs; b CCVs; c C E vs. COD removal; d Polarization and power outputs of ZnO/AC and blank DMFCs

Fig. 2 a
Fig. 2 a DCMFC photograph with schematic details; b and c SEM of anode before and after inoculation

Fig. 4
Fig. 4 DET and MET pathways identified in the present study via TEM analysis

Fig. 6 a
Fig. 6 a Biomass assay and b biofilm formation for the nine identified strains

Table 2
Comparison of the current study with the literature DC double chamber, SC single chamber, OCV open circuit potential, CCV close circuit potential, COD removal efficiency, C E coulombic efficiency

Table 3
Biochemical analysis details of isolated anodic communities

Table 4
Sequences producing significant alignments of the 16 S rRNA gene of isolates compared to the most similar strains documented in the GenBank of NCBI database Saccharomyces uvarum culture CBS:2444 small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence KC581674.1 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae NR111007.1.These previous strains were correlated with the most dominant phyla, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Ascomycota and Actinobacteria, which were used for bioelectricity generation.According to the findings of the present study, additional attention will be

Table 5
Biomass and biofilm assay for nine different strains at OD 570 and OD 600 , respectively NC* = negative control (medium only).Different letters represent significant differences (Duncan's test indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05) among all treatments