Skip to main content

Assessment of surface water quality and monitoring in southern Vietnam using multicriteria statistical approaches


The study was conducted to analyze surface water quality fluctuations in the the southern region of Vietnam using monitoring data at 58 locations. Seventeen water quality indicators were analyzed including pH, temperature, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), total dissolved solids (TDS), total suspended solids (TSS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD), ammoniacal nitrogen (NH4+- N), nitrite nitrogen (NO2-N), nitrate nitrogen, iron (Fe), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), arsenic (As), and chloride (Cl ions). The study used water quality index (WQI), cluster analysis (CA), principal component analysis (PCA), and Entropy weighted methods to analyze surface water quality. The results showed that the surface water was contaminated with organics (low DO and high TSS, BOD, COD), nutrients (high NH4+-N) and Fe. While Pb at some locations exceeded the allowable limit of the national technical regulation, other indicators (Cd, Hg and As) were within this standard. Moreover, DO, TSS, BOD, COD, NH4+-N, Fe, EC, TDS, and Cl were seasonally fluctuated. WQI classified water quality from bad to very good (WQI = 42–100) due to the impact of hydrological conditions, navigation, wastewater from industrial zones, and fishing ports. The results of CA suggested that it is possible to reduce the 11 sampling locations (from 33 to 22 locations) in clusters 1–6 and the frequency of monitoring from 8 to 5 times per year, which still ensures representativeness of water quality over time. This reduction allows lowering the monitoring costs by 56.5%. The PCA identified five major potential sources explaining 87.3% and 8 minor sources explaining only 12.7% of water quality variation. Temperature, pH, EC, DO, BOD, COD, NH4+-N, NO2-N, Fe, Cl, Pb are important indicators need to periodically be monitored. Furthermore, orthophosphate, total phosphate, total nitrogen, coliforms should be considered to add into the next monitoring program. Locations with medium and bad water quality are concentrated in Dong Nai, Ho Chi Minh City and Long An, which requires finding effective solutions to improve the water quality. The current results can assist in decision-making related to environmental quality monitoring in the southern region of Vietnam.


Water plays an important role for organisms and humans. Therefore, regular water quality monitoring is considered a top priority for all countries in the world [1, 2]. Monitoring water quality not only helps countries assess and predict pollution but also provides information for planning the sustainable use of water resources [3,4,5]. Vietnam conducts annual environmental monitoring of surface water, underground water, and seawater in environmental management services. Monitoring the water environment is assigned to the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment and the People’s Committees of 63 provinces and cities. Water environment monitoring is also carried out by production and business establishments in accordance with the current environmental protection law [6]. Physical, chemical, and biological indicators are used in environmental monitoring in water bodies in Vietnam. The physical and chemical parameters include temperature, pH, total suspended solids (TSS), turbidity, dissolved oxygen (DO), biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammoniacal nitrogen (NH4+-N), orthophosphate, heavy metals (iron (Fe), aluminum, manganese, crom, cadmium (Cd), etc.), chloride (Cl ions), sulfate, pesticides, antibiotics, and biological factors (Escherichia coli, coliform) [7]. Monitoring results are evaluated using national technical regulations on surface water quality (QCVN 08-MT:2015/BTNMT) or water quality index (WQI) [7,8,9]. These assessment methods are simple, using only one or a few criteria included in water quality assessment, thus not fully exploiting the important information hidden in the very large dataset [5, 9,10,11].

Currently, multivariate statistical methods are widely used in water quality assessment. Multivariate statistical methods can include all the water quality information in the calculation simultaneously, which can extract significant inferences from the dataset [5, 11,12,13,14]. It is incorporated with cluster analysis (CA), principal component analysis (PCA) methods to assess the quality of rivers, lakes, and groundwater water [10, 13, 15,16,17,18,19]. The CA method is based on the similarity of water quality in space and time and can therefore assess sampling locations and sampling frequencies [5, 9,10,11]. In addition, entropy weight was also used to measure the importance of key parameters in each cluster of CA analysis over time and to find out the key parameters causing the differences between clusters [15, 20]. Meanwhile, the principal component analysis method extracts important information about the criteria affecting the water quality and the potential sources of pollution leading to water quality fluctuations, from which it can be used to identify representative indicators to assess water quality [5, 10, 11, 14, 17, 21].

The southern region of Vietnam is a dynamic economic zone with a high economic growth rate, with large industrial, business and service activities. It comprises of many industrial parks and handicraft production establishments widely dispersed in different sized localities types. The development of industrial zones and clusters is not synchronized with the technical infrastructure conditions on the environment; many industrial zones and clusters have not yet been invested in a centralized wastewater treatment system [4]. Along with the socio-economic development, the surface water quality is increasingly declining due to receiving domestic and industrial wastewater and agricultural runoff [4, 17, 22]. Domestic and industrial wastewater might contain hazardous substances from the production processes, and the residue of pesticides and fertilizers could exist in runoff and flow into surface water. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor water quality in areas affected by socio-economic development activities. This study applied multivariate statistical analysis to analyze water quality fluctuations using data from 58 monitoring locations in the southern region of Vietnam. The research results could provide useful information for the southern environmental management agency in reviewing and re-evaluating the effective monitoring system of surface water quality.

Materials and methods

Water sampling and analysis

The southern region of Vietnam consists of 21 provinces/cities, including two major key economic regions, the southern key economic zone and the Mekong River Delta, and two river basins, namely the Dong Nai River and the Mekong River. Monitoring of surface water quality in the South was carried out at 58 locations including Binh Duong (6 locations, BD1-BD6), Binh Phuoc (4 locations, BP1-BP4), Ba Ria-Vung Tau (3 locations, VT1-VT3), Dong Nai (15 locations, DN1-DN15), Ho Chi Minh City (12 locations, HCM1-HCM12), Long An (4 locations, LA1-LA4), Tay Ninh (5 locations, TN1-TN5), An Giang (5 locations, AG1-AG5), Tien Giang (2 locations, TG1-TG2), Dong Thap (1 location, DT1) and Ben Tre (1 location, BT1). The sampling location is shown in Fig. 1. Water samples were collected monthly from April to December in 2020 (eight times per year) using 17 parameters to assess the water quality. Water samples were collected and preserved according to the instructions in Vietnamese standards [7]. The pH, temperature, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), DO were measured on site using multi-parameters YSI 6820 (USA), Hach HQ40d (Hach, USA), Turb 430 T-WTW (Xylem –WTW, Germany). TSS, COD, BOD, ammona nitrogen (NH4+-N), nitrite nitrogen (NO2-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), Cl, Fe, Cd, lead (Pb), mercury (Hg) and arsenic (As) were measured in the laboratory using standard methods, in which the heavy metal was analyzed by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer [23]. The measurement methods and allowable limits of water quality indicators are presented in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the sampling locations

Table 1 Methods for water analysis and limit values

Data analysis

Evaluation of water quality characteristics was performed based on the average value of each criterion of 8 sampling periods at 58 locations and presented in Boxplot form to describe the change over time of the water quality parameters. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test the normal distribution at 5% significance level using SPSS version 20.0.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The WQI index is calculated based on parameters including temperature, pH, DO, BOD, COD, NH4+, NO2, NO3, As, Cd, Pb according to the guidance of Decision 1460/QD-TCMT dated November 12, 2019 of the Vietnam Environment Administration on the issuance of a manual for calculating the WQI [8]. The WQI parameter has a value from 0 to 100 and is divided into 6 levels, as presented in Table 2. Geographic information system software QGIS version 3.16 was used to present the spatial distribution of the WQI. In this study, WQI was calculated using Microsoft Excel 2016.

Table 2 The values of WQI and suitable for use purpose

CA was used to group water quality by sampling location and sampling frequency, using Euclidean distance [10]. CA results are presented as a tree structure. Sampling locations or times with similar water quality are grouped into the same group based on the linkage distance [11]. The linkage distance represents the quotient between the linkage distance (Dlink) divided by the maximal distance (Dmax). The link distance between clusters is considered to have clustering significance when Dlink/Dmax × 100 = 60 [11]. The water quality characteristics of each cluster in cluster analysis according to the sampling frequency were weighted using the entropy information method to rank importance according to Li et al. [24]. The larger the information coefficient, the lower the entropy weight and the smaller the impact on water quality [24]. Therefore, entropy weight could measure the order degree of parameters in the cluster. Specifically, the higher the weight of the water quality parameters is the greater the influence. Conversely, the smaller the weighted value of the parameter is the less significant the influence [24].

PCA was used to identify potential sources of pollution and key indicators affecting water quality in the southern region of Vietnam. Potential sources affecting water quality are determined based on the Eigenvalue coefficient. If the Eigenvalues coefficient is greater than 1, the principal component (PC) is considered significant in causing the variability of the data (can be considered the main source); in stark contrast, when Eigenvalues coefficient of PC is lower than 1, it means that the PC contributed insignificantly to the variability of the data (can be called the secondary source) [21]. Meanwhile, the weighted correlation coefficient is used to determine the main indicators affecting water quality. The weighted correlation coefficient is divided into three levels of high, moderate and weak, with absolute values > 0.75, 0.75–0.50 and 0.50–0.30, respectively [10]. The higher the correlation coefficient, the major contributor to water quality variability and therefore needs to be monitored [10]. CA and PCA were performed using Statgraphics Centurion version XVI software (Statgraphics Technologies,Virginia, USA).


Evaluating surface water quality in southern Vietnam

The temperature between months of April to December ranged from 25.3 to 35.3 °C, while it fluctuated between locations from 28.6–31.4 °C, with an average of 58 sites for eight months 30.1 °C. The pH ranged over time and space between 5.2–9.0 and 5.9–7.9, with a median of 58 sites for eight months of 7.1 (Fig. 2a). The pH at some locations was slightly alkaline and exceeded the allowable limit of 8.5 [7], but it is still within the allowable limit of 9. EC and TDS fluctuated greatly (Fig. 2c and d). EC at the sampling periods and locations fluctuated from 15 to 59,200 and 38–47,400 mS cm− 1, respectively, reaching the average value of 58 sites for eight months at 5390 mS cm− 1. Moreover, TDS fluctuated over time and space were 8–34,300 and 17–26,070 mg L− 1, respectively, with the average of 58 sites for eight months at 2820 mg L− 1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Characteristics of surface water quality in southern Vietnam (Apr: April, Jun: June, Jul: July, Aug: August, Sep: September, Nov: November, Dec: December)

DO concentration fluctuated greatly by months and sampling sites in the range of 0.2–10.8 and 0.6–7.8 mg L− 1, respectively, with an average value of 4.6 mg L− 1. DO in the study area is lower than the permissible limit of ≥6 mg L− 1 [7]. DO has great volatility in April and July (Fig. 2e). Besides that, BOD at 58 survey sites varied from 1.6 to 48.8 mg L− 1, while BOD between months of sampling ranged from 0 to 79 mg L− 1. BOD in the rainy season months (May–September) fluctuated more than that in the dry season months (Fig. 2f). BOD at most locations exceeded the allowable limit of 4 mg L− 1 [7]. Similarly, COD between months and sampling sites ranged from 8 to 91 and 3 to 139 mg L− 1, with the mean value at 17.5 mg L− 1 (Fig. 2g). COD has exceeded the allowable limit (10 mg L− 1) of QCVN 08-MT:2015/BTNMT, column A1 [7]. TSS at sites and months fluctuated from 9 to 111 and 3–495 mg L− 1, respectively, with an average of 36 mg L− 1 (Fig. 2b). TSS has seasonal variation in which the rainy season is usually higher than that in the dry season. TSS at most locations exceeded the allowable limit (20 mg L− 1).

The concentration of NH4+-N between the months of sampling fluctuated in the range of 1.0–24.9 mg L− 1, while this concentration between the sampling sites was in the range of 0.1–15.0 mg L− 1 (Fig. 2h), reaching an average value of 1.0 mg L− 1. NH4+ in the study area has significant spatiotemporal fluctuations. According to QCVN 08-MT:2015/BTNMT column A1, limit value of N-NH4+ is 0.3 mg L− 1 [7]. NO2-N in water fluctuated in space and time with concentrations of 0–0.34 and 0–0.69 mg L− 1, respectively, with an average of 0.03 mg L− 1 (Fig. 2i). In locations with high concentration of NH4+ and low DO, the nitrite-nitrogen concentration accumulated and exceeded the allowable limit of 0.05 mg L− 1 [7]. NO3-N between sampling months and sampling sites ranged from 0 to 3.7 and 0.1–2.0 mg L− 1, with the mean values at 0.8 mg L− 1. NO3 concenrration was highest in locations such as Cat Lai ferry terminal (Dong Nai), Ho Chi Minh City area, Tan Thanh wharf (Long An) and Vedan Port (Tay Ninh). NO3 concentration in April was significantly higher than that in other months. The fluctuation of NO3 concentration depends on the concentration of NH4+ and DO. The limit value of NO3-N is 2 mg L− 1 according to QCVN 08-MT:2015/BTNMT, column A1 [7], so only some positions at certain times exceed the allowed regulation.

The maximum Fe concentration at the locations was 4.4 mg L− 1 and at the time of sampling was 16.1 mg L− 1, averaged at 1.8 mg L− 1. All samples having Fe concentration exceeded the allowable limit of 0.5 mg L− 1 [7]. Fe in the rainy season tended to be higher than in the dry season (Fig. 2o). High Cl concentration is concentrated in the area near the sea of Ho Chi Minh City (HCM1, HCM10–12) with concentrations exceeding the allowable limit of 250 mg L− 1 [7]. The remaining positions all have Cl concentrations within the allowable limits. Cl has a marked seasonal variation in which the dry season is higher than that in the rainy season. The trend of Cl fluctuations is similar to that of EC and TDS. High Cl concentrations lead to high EC and TDS (Fig. 2c and d). Pb in the study areas was within the allowable limit of 0.02 mg L− 1 [7], except for some locations such as Ong Buong bridge (HCM5 in May), lower Tri An dam (BD6 in June) and Be River estuary (BP4 in June) exceed the allowable limit (Fig. 2m). Cd and As at all locations through the sampling sessions were within the allowable limits of 0.005 and 0.01 mg L− 1, respectively (Fig. 2l and n) [7].


The calculation results of WQI in the study area are presented in Fig. 3. WQI in Binh Duong (95–100) and Binh Phuoc (91–99), An Giang (94–100), Tien Giang (92), Ben Tre (92), Dong Thap (95) indicated that the water quality in these provinces was classified as very good. Water quality in Tay Ninh is classified as good, with WQI ranging from 76 to 96. The water quality in Dong Nai was varied greatly and graded from moderate to very good (WQI = 66–100). Locations with medium water quality included DN11, DN12, DN14 and DN15 (WQI = 66–73). Water quality in the Ho Chi Minh City area was divided into three classes, as follows: class with bad water quality (WQIHCM1-HCM3, HCM5 –HCM7 = 42–48), medium (WQIHCM4, HCM8-HCM11 = 52–74), and good (WQIHCM12 = 81). Meanwhile, water quality in Long An was classified bad (WQILA1-LA2 = 45–48), moderate (WQILA3 = 58) and good (WQILA4 = 76).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of WQI at the monitoring locations

Evaluating the sampling sites and frequencies of the surface water quality monitoring

Water quality in the South of Vietnam varies greatly. Based on the Euclidean distance, the water quality at 58 sampling sites was classified into 15 clusters (Fig. 4). Water quality similarity of sites in each cluster can be suggested to reduce the number of monitoring sites in the future. Specifically, the water quality characteristics in the identified clusters are presented in Table 3. Cluster 1 has 3 positions (BD1–2, BP1) located in Binh Duong and Binh Phuoc provinces. In cluster 1, TSS, NH4+-N, COD, Fe exceeded the permissible limits of 20, 0.3, 10 and 0.5 mg L− 1, respectively. Cluster 2 has 6 positions (VT1, DN3–6); cluster 3 has 6 positions (DN7–8, TG1–2, DT1, BT1). Clusters 2 and 3 have parameters TSS, DO, COD, Fe that do not meet the requirements of the allowable limits. These clusters mainly belong to Dong Nai, Tien Giang, Dong Thap, Ben Tre, Ba Ria-Vung Tau provinces. Likewise, Cluster 4 has 3 positions (BD4, BD6, BP4); cluster 5 has 10 positions (BD5, BP2–3, VT2–3, DN1–2, DN9–11); cluster 6 has 5 positions (AG1–5). TSS and Fe indicators in cluster 4 (located in Binh Duong and Binh Phuoc provinces) exceeded the allowable limits; while BOD, COD, N-NH4+, Fe in cluster 5 (including locations in Binh Duong, Binh Phuoc, Dong Nai, Ba Ria-Vung Tau) exceeded the allowable limits. Cluster 6 (mainly An Giang) has only TSS and Fe criteria that do not meet the permissible limits of 20 and 0.5 mg L− 1, respectively.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Clustering surface water quality by sampling locations

Table 3 Water quality in the identified clusters

Cluster 7 (DN12–15, HCM8–9); cluster 8 has 1 position (LA3); cluster 9 has 2 positions (HCM10–11); cluster 10 has 4 positions (HCM1–4); cluster 11 has 1 position (LA2); cluster 12 has 1 position (HCM5); cluster 13 has 3 positions (LA1, HCM6–7); cluster 14 has 1 position (HCM12) and cluster 15 has 6 positions (LA4, TN1-TN5). Clusters 7–13 (including Long An, Dong Nai and Ho Chi Minh City) have TSS, DO, BOD, COD, NH4+-N, Fe exceeding the allowable limits. Particularly for clusters 12–13, organic and nutrient pollution are very serious, possibly because these places received more pollutants from wastewater and waste than the other locations. In addition, lead in cluster 12 was detected at concentrations reaching the limit of 0.02 mg L− 1 [7]. TSS, DO, BOD, COD, Fe, Cl of cluster 14 (1 location in Ho Chi Minh City) have exceeded the allowable limits. Meanwhile, DO, COD, N-NO2 characterize water quality in cluster 15 (locations in Tay Ninh province, only one location in Long An province).

Based on the Euclidean distance, water quality according to sampling periods was classified into 5 clusters (Fig. 5). Cluster I includes April (end of the dry season); cluster II, cluster III and cluster IV include May and June, July and August, September, respectively; which all months belong to the rainy season. While cluster V was formed by two months at the beginning of the dry season (November and December). The results show that the water quality fluctuates greatly over time in which the water quality in the dry season months tended to be separate from the rainy season months. Pollution characteristics according to identified clusters are presented in Table 4. Besides that, entropy weight of parameter represents the effect of that parameter on water quality of cluster. Cluster I was characterized by indicators in descending order NH4+-N > EC = TDS > Fe > BOD; cluster II by TDS > EC > NH4+-N > NO2-N > TSS = Pb. Cluster III was characterized by EC = TDS > NH4+-N > Cl. Cluster IV was characterized by EC = TDS > Cl > NH4+-N while cluster V was characterized by EC = TDS > NH4+-N > Cl.

Fig. 5
figure 5

CA results according to the sampling frequency

Table 4 Weights of water quality parameters in the identified clusters

Identifying key water parameters influencing water quality

The PCA results show that water quality in the southern region of Vietnam is affected by many sources of pollution. In which, PC1–5 is considered the main source because it has an Eigenvalue > 1, explaining 87.3% of the variation in water quality. Meanwhile, the sources from PC6–13 as secondary explained only 12.7% of the variation (Table 5). In addition, Table 5 also showed that the loading coefficient of the main PCs had weak correlations with the parameters of temperature, pH, TDS, EC, DO, BOD, COD, NH4+, NO2, Fe; had moderate correlations with pH, NH4+, NO3, and a good correlation with Cl. Secondary PCs had moderate to good correlations with all parameters except Cl (Table 5).

Table 5 Potential polluting sources and key water parameters influencing surface water

The water quality indicators in the southern region are affected by many pollution sources. For example, PC2, PC5 and PC6 indicated only weakly positive values for temperature and moderately by PC7; this suggested that there were about four potential sources of temperature variation. Similarly, pH was affected by 3 factors at weak level and 1 factor at medium level; EC and TDS were weakly affected by 2 factors and moderately affected by 1 factor. DO was weakly affected by PC1, 8, 9, and moderately by PC10. BOD was affected weakly by PC1 and strongly by PC12 while COD was weakly affected by PC1, PC12 but moderately affected by PC11. TSS was weakly affected by 1 factor, moderately affected by 3 factors (Table 5). NH4+ was moderately affected by PC11 but weakly affected by PC1, PC3, and PC12. NO3 is moderately affected by PC3 but weakly affected by PC7 and PC9. NO2 was weakly affected by 4 factors, moderately affected by 1 factor. Fe was weakly affected by PC4, PC9 and moderately affected by PC7. Cl was strongly affected by PC7 and weakly affected by PC7.


Evaluating surface water quality in southern Vietnam

Temperature fluctuations are insignificant because water has the function of temperature regulation [1, 25]. Temperature is in the range suitable for aquatic organisms [26]. The pH in the study areas is affected by wastewater and hydrological regime. pH in major rivers in the Mekong Delta is usually neutral, except for some coastal provinces where it is tested to be alkaline [1, 19, 25, 27, 28]. In addition, this has resulted in high EC and TDS in estuary areas where brackish and saline water intrusion is possible. In addition, TDS and EC are also affected by inorganic substances present in wastewater or effluents discharged into receiving waters [1, 4, 22].

At many locations DO is very low due to the impact of wastewater containing organic compounds and NH4+ [22, 29]. The fluctuations of DO are due to the presence of organic matters, the presence of algae, air diffusion and pH [4, 26]. The results show that low DO and high BOD, COD revealed that surface water quality in the south of Vietnam has organic pollution, especially in Dong Nai area, Ho Chi Minh city and Long An where there are crowd industrial parks, and busy transport and fishing ports. Previous studies in the Mekong Delta also showed that the water was organically polluted and had seasonal fluctuations [1, 19, 27, 28, 30, 31]. NH4+ is present in wastewater, domestic waste, agriculture, industry, and landfills [4, 17, 22, 32]. High NH4+ is found in Dong Nai, Ho Chi Minh City and Long An areas where there are many industrial zones and fishing ports. The findings show that water bodies are contaminated with nutrients, potentially leading to eutrophication of the water environment [33]. Nutrient pollution is a water quality issue of concern in the Mekong Delta waters, mainly caused by wastewater from treatment systems and agricultural production [4, 30, 31].

Iron in the aquatic environment in the study area was predicted to be from natural sources (acid sulfate soils) or industrial wastewater [4, 9, 17, 22, 34]. The presence of Fe in surface waters is a common problem in the Mekong Delta [1, 4, 31]. Other heavy metals are often derived from agricultural and industrial wastewater [17, 22, 35, 36].

The results show that water quality varies greatly according to sampling location, the most polluted locations are in Dong Nai, Ho Chi Minh City and Long An where there are many navigation activities, industrial zones, and fishing ports. DO, TSS, BOD, COD, NH4+, Fe, EC, TDS, Cl were seasonal fluctuations. The water quality in the southern part of Vietnam is contaminated with organic (low DO while TSS, BOD, and COD are high), nutrients (mainly NH4+) and Fe. Pb in some locations exceeded the permissible limit. However, heavy metals such as Cd and As were within the allowable limits of 0.005 and 0.01 mg L− 1, respectively [7]. This result is also consistent with previous studies on water quality in the Mekong Delta that have contaminated organic, Fe, and nutrient, even microorganisms [1, 4, 9, 19, 25, 27, 30, 31, 37].

On the other hand, the WQI results show that the water quality from Dong Nai, Ho Chi Minh and Long An areas is worse than that in other areas. The reason may be that this area receives wastes from socio-economic development activities with inadequate and ineffective wastewater treatment systems [4, 17, 22, 35]. According to Nhien and Nguyen [32], these places with bad water quality are owing to the effects of agricultural production and landfills, and good water quality places had less impacts from these pollution sources. Water quality in large rivers is better than in tributaries [28, 31, 38, 39].

Evaluating the sampling sites and frequencies of the surface water quality monitoring

The results of CA are consistent with the calculation results of the WQI. This has also been reported in previous studies [28, 40]. Clusters 1 to 6 have very good water quality, while clusters 7 to 14 are characterized by poor to moderate overall water quality, cluster 15 is characterized by good overall water quality. The results show that water quality varies greatly by sampling sites, mainly due to industrial production, agriculture, transportation, and marine economic activities. Previous studies have shown that locations with the same water quality, in the same water body, can be considered for reduction to save on monitoring costs [5, 10, 11, 21]. This study proposes that monitoring sites from clusters 1 to 6 can reduce sampling sites because of similar water quality. It accounts for one third of the total monitoring locations, from 33 locations to 22 locations, which can reduce 19% of monitoring costs. Otherwise, these 11 locations could be considered to switch to other potential polluted areas to promptly detect pollution problems.

For the cluster according to the sampling frequency, previous studies also found similar results that water quality was clustered by seasons [10, 13, 14, 28, 39]. The order of importance of the indicators changes with the seasons; that is, these indicators are affected by the observational periods. Clusters with similar water characteristics may consider reducing the sampling frequency. The results show that the sampling frequency could be reduced one for each Cluster II, Cluster III and Cluster V. Thus, this study recommends monitoring frequency from 8 to 5 times per year (April, June, August, September, November) depending on funding and human resources. This reduces monitoring costs by nearly 37.5%. Chounlamany et al. (2017) [10] also proposed to reduce the frequency of sampling for monitoring surface water quality based on the results of temporal CA.

Identifying key water parameters influencing water quality

In this study, changes in climate and weather are considered to be the main factors causing temperature fluctuations in surface water. Because the study area has a monsoon climate and two distinct seasons, this was also demonstrated in the CA analysis results. Furthermore, one of the reasons that can be mentioned in the study area (which has had rapid urbanization) is the impact of thermal runoff pollution. This means that precipitation has limited the natural infiltration into the soil in urbanized areas, resulting in the precipitation having to flow into surface areas of the heat-absorbing material; eventually flowing into the canals. Temperature fluctuations caused by the action of impervious surfaces have also been studied previously by Yang et al. (2021) [41]. In addition, the factor leading to the pH change may be due to the characteristics of wastewater and seawater [4, 22]. EC, TDS, Cl are mainly affected by saline intrusion and dissolved ions in wastewater [4, 17, 22]; TSS from riverbank erosion, plankton [1, 4, 25, 42]. Organic substances represent the discharge processes [29]; while nutrients (NH4+, NO2 and NO3) represent the contributions of hydrological factors, wastewater from domestic, agriculture and industry. It is explained that agricultural cultivation (Southwest) and industrial production (Northeast) are two important activities of the region, which also lead to the attraction of migration from other provinces; therefore, these can be identified as two potential sources of pollution in the area. These factors have also been reported in several previous studies [17, 22, 27, 35, 43]. Fe was derived from natural and industrial wastewater [17, 22, 28, 31] while other heavy metals (Pb, As, Cd) were derived from industrial waste [4, 17]. The findings show that the parameters of temperature, pH, TDS, EC, DO, BOD, COD, NH4+, NO2, Fe, Cl, Pb need to be monitored while Hg, As, Cd may not need or can reduce the frequency of monitoring because their concentrations are always within the allowable level or below the detection limit. NO3 may also not need to be monitored because it can be commented from NH4+, NO2 and DO by in-stream nitrification. In addition, NO3 is less harmful to the environment than NH4+ and NO2 in the study areas. EC and TDS have a close relationship, so only one of these two indicators is selected for monitoring. In this study, the important water quality indicators such as orthophosphate, total phosphate, total nitrogen, and coliforms have not been observed and need to be added to the future monitoring program for a more comprehensive assessment of surface water quality in the study area.


The results present that the water quality varies greatly according to the sampling locations, and the most polluted locations are in Dong Nai, Ho Chi Minh City and Long An where there are many navigation activities, industrial parks, and fishing ports. DO, TSS, BOD, COD, N-NH4+, Fe, EC, TDS, and Cl have seasonal fluctuations. The water quality was contaminated with organic (low DO and high TSS, BOD, and COD), nutrients (mainly N-NH4+) and Fe. Pb at some locations exceeded the allowable limit. Heavy metals such as Cd, Hg and As are within the allowable limits of QCVN 08-MT:2015/BTNMT, column A1. WQI shows that water quality is classified from bad to very good (WQI = 42–100), in which good water quality is concentrated in Binh Phuoc, An Giang, Tien Giang, Ben Tre, Dong Thap provinces. Also, the average and bad water quality is concentrated in Dong Nai, Ho Chi Minh City, Long An. CA classifies water into 15 clusters in which clusters 1–6 have very good water quality, cluster 15 have good water quality, while clusters 7–14 have poor to moderate water quality. This study proposes to reduce the total number of monitoring points of clusters 1–6 by one third from 33 to 22 locations, reducing monitoring costs by about 19%. According to the sampling periods, water quality is classified into 5 clusters. It is recommended that the frequency of monitoring be reduced from 8 to 5 times per year, which helps to reduce monitoring costs by nearly 37.5%. The PCA results identified 5 major potential sources explaining 87.3% and 8 minor sources explaining only 12.7% of water quality variation. The parameters of temperature, pH, EC, DO, BOD, COD, N-NH4+, N-NO2, Fe, Cl, Pb need to be continuously monitored. Orthophosphate, total phosphate, total nitrogen, coliforms need to be added to the future monitoring program to assess surface water quality more comprehensively in the study area. The study provides important scientific information that can support future surface water quality monitoring.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.


  1. Ly K, Larsen H, Duyen NV. 2013 Lower Mekong Regional Water Quality Monitoring Report. Vientiane: Mekong River Commission; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Behmel S, Damour M, Ludwig R, Rodriguez MJ. Water quality monitoring strategies – a review and future perspectives. Sci Total Environ 2016;571:1312–29.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Turner S, Pangare G, Mather RJ. Water governance: a situation analysis of Cambodia, Lao PDR and Viet Nam. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. State of the National Environment in 2018: Water Environment of River Basins. Hanoi: Viet Nam Publishing House of Natural Resources, Environment and Cartography; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mama AC, Bodo WKA, Ghepdeu GFY, Ajonina GN, Ndam JRN. Understanding seasonal and spatial variation of water quality parameters in mangrove estuary of the Nyong River using multivariate analysis (Cameroon Southern Atlantic Coast). Open J Mar Sci 2021;11:103–28.

    Google Scholar 

  6. VNA. Law on Environmental Protection. Hanoi: Vietnam National Assembly; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  7. MONRE. National Technical Regulation on Surface Water Quality. Hanoi: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  8. VEA. Decision 1460/QD-TCMT on the Issuing of Technical Guide to Calculation and Disclosure Vietnam Water Quality Index (WQI). Hanoi: Vietnam Environment Administration; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giao NT, Nhien HTH, Anh PK, Ni DV. Classification of water quality in low-lying area in Vietnamese Mekong delta using set pair analysis method and Vietnamese water quality index. Environ Monit Assess 2021;193:319.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chounlamany V, Tanchuling MA, Inoue T. Spatial and temporal variation of water quality of a segment of Marikina River using multivariate statistical methods. Water Sci Technol 2017;76:1510–22.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Le TTH, Zeunert S, Lorenz M, Meon G. Multivariate statistical assessment of a polluted river under nitrification inhibition in the tropics. Environ Sci Pollut R 2017;24:13845–62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oketola AA, Adekolurejo SM, Osibanjo OO. Water quality assessment of river Ogun using multivariate statistical techniques. J Environ Prot 2013;4:466–79.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Badillo-Camacho J, Reynaga-Delgado E, Barcelo-Quintal I, del Valle PFZ, Lopez-Chuken UJ, Orozco-Guareno E, et al. Water quality assessment of a tropical Mexican Lake using multivariate statistical techniques. J Environ Prot 2015;6:215–24.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Horvat Z, Horvat M, Pastor K. Assessment of spatial and temporal water quality distribution of Lake Ludas, Serbia. 2021. Preprint at Research Square  Available at:

  15. Li PY, Qian H, Wu JH. Application of set pair analysis method based on entropy weight in groundwater quality assessment – a case study in Dongsheng City, Northwest China. E-J Chem 2011;8:851–58.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Islam MM, Lenz OK, Azad AK, Ara MH, Rahman M, Hassan N. Assessment of spatio-temporal variations in water quality of Shailmari River, Khulna (Bangladesh) using multivariate statistical techniques. J Geosci Environ Prot 2017;5:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ojok W, Wasswa J, Ntambi E. Assessment of seasonal variation in water quality in River Rwizi using multivariate statistical techniques, Mbarara Municipality, Uganda. J Water Resour Prot 2017;9:83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miao TS, Lu WX, Luo JN, Guo JY. Application of set pair analysis and uncertainty analysis in groundwater pollution assessment and prediction: a case study of a typical molybdenum mining area in central Jilin province, China. Environ Earth Sci 2019;78:323.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen TG, Minh VQ. Evaluating surface water quality and water monitoring parameters in the Tien River, Vietnamese Mekong Delta. J Teknologi 2021;83:29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Singh KR, Dutta R, Kalamdhad AS, Kumar B. Information entropy as a tool in surface water quality assessment. Environ Earth Sci 2019;78:15.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shrestha S, Kazama F. Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environ Modell Softw 2007;22:464–75.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Atwebembeire J, Andama M, Yatuha J, Lejju JB, Rugunda GK, Bazira J. The physico-chemical quality of effluents of selected sewage treatment plants draining into River Rwizi, Mbarara Municipality, Uganda. J Water Resour Prot 2019;11:20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  23. APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li CH, Sun L, Jia JX, Cai YP, Wang X. Risk assessment of water pollution sources based on an integrated k-means clustering and set pair analysis method in the region of Shiyan, China. Sci Total Environ 2016;557–8:307–16.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ongley ED. Water quality of the lower Mekong river. In: Campbell IC, editor. The Mekong. San Diego: Academic press; 2009. p. 297–320.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boyd CE. Water quality for pond aquaculture. Auburn: Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nguyen GT. Evaluating current water quality monitoring system on Hau River, Mekong Delta, Vietnam using multivariate statistical techniques. Appl Environ Res 2020;42:14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nguyen TG, Lam TKT, Huynh THN. Coastal water quality assessment in Bac Lieu province, Vietnam. J Ener Technol Environ 2021;3:31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Barakat A, Baghdadi ME, Rais J, Aghezzaf B, Slassi M. Assessment of spatial and seasonal water quality variation of Oum Er Rbia River (Morocco) using multivariate statistical techniques. Int Soil Water Conser Res 2016;4:284–92.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nguyen HTL, Nguyen TG. Surface water quality in canals in An Giang province, Viet Nam, from 2009 to 2016. J Viet Env 2018;10:113–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dinh DAT, Bui AT, Nguyen HT. Assessing quality of surface water for urban water supply source for Soc Trang City. Can Tho Univ J Sci 2019;55:61–70 [in Vietnamese].

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nhien HTH, Nguyen GT. Environmental soil, water and sediment quality of Dong Thang landfill in Can Tho City, Vietmam. Appl Environ Res 2019;41:73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Boyd CE, Green BW. Coastal Water Quality Monitoring in Shrimp Farming Areas: an Example from Honduras. World Bank/NACA/WWF/FAO Consortium; 2002 Boyd CE, Green BW. Coastal Water Quality Monitoring in Shrimp Farming Areas, An Example from Honduras. Report prepared under the World Bank, NACA, WWF and FAO Consortium Program on Shrimp Farming and the Environment. Work in Progress for Public Discussion. Published by the Consortium. 2002. 29 pages. Available at:

  34. Le VD, Nguyen TG, Truong HD. The variation of water quality in three land use types in U Minh Ha National Park, Ca Mau province, Vietnam using multivariate statistical approaches. Water Sui 2021;13:1501.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bolstad PV, Swank WT. Cumulative impacts of landuse on water quality in a southern Appalachian watershed. J Am Water Resour As 1997;33:519–33.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Khadija D, Hicham A, Rida A, Hicham E, Nordine N, Najlaa F. Surface water quality assessment in the semi-arid area by a combination of heavy metal pollution indices and statistical approaches for sustainable management. Environ Chall 2021;5:100230.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chea R, Grenouillet G, Lek S. Evidence of water quality degradation in lower Mekong Basin revealed by self-organizing map. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0145527.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nguyen TG. Surface water quality at the branches adjacent to Hau river in Can Tho city. Sci Technol J Agric Rural Dev 2020;15:79–86 [in Vietnamese].

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nguyen GT, Huynh THN. Application of GIS and multi-criteria statistical techniques in assessing water quality in the coastal province of Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Appl Environ Res 2021;43:17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nguyen TG. Application of multivariate statistical techniques in selecting surface water quality monitoring sites at Bung Binh Thien reservoir, An Giang, Vietnams. J Sci Nat Res Environ 2020;33:52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yang K, Zhang Y, Luo Y, Shang CX. Precipitation events impact on urban lake surface water temperature under the perspective of macroscopic scale. Environ Sci Pollut R 2021;28:16767–80.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dalal SG, Shirodkar PV, Jagtap TG, Naik BG, Rao GS. Evaluation of significant sources influencing the variation of water quality of Kandla creek, Gulf of Katchchh, using PCA. Environ Monit Assess 2010;163:49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Muangthong S, Shrestha S. Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: case study of the Nampong River and Songkhram River, Thailand. Environ Monit Assess 2015;187:548.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank for the data provision from Southern Environmental Monitoring Center in the South region. The scientific and personal views presented in this paper do not nec-essarily reflect the views of the data provider.


This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conceptualization, N.T.G. and H.T.H.N.; methodology, N.T.G.; software, H.T.H.N.; validation, N.T.G., H.T.H.N.; formal analysis, H.T.H.N.; investigation, N.T.G.; resources, N.T.G.; data curation, N.T.G.; writing-original draft preparation, N.T.G. and H.T.H.N; writing-review and editing, N.T.G; visualization, H.T.H.N.; supervision, N.T.G.; project administration, N.T.G.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thanh Giao Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, T.G., Huynh, T.H.N. Assessment of surface water quality and monitoring in southern Vietnam using multicriteria statistical approaches. Sustain Environ Res 32, 20 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Entropy weight
  • Heavy metals
  • Nutrients
  • Organic matters
  • Water quality