Skip to main content

Hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites from residual waste generated via indirect carbonation of coal fly ash

Abstract

Indirect carbonation, a technology to store CO2 and produce stable CaCO3 and MgCO3, involves elution of Ca and Mg from industrial waste and subsequent carbonation. Although substantial residual waste is generated after the elution of Ca and Mg, its recycling attributes have not been adequately scrutinized. The residual waste has lower Ca and Mg contents and higher Si and Al contents than those of the raw material (i.e., industrial waste). This study involves the hydrothermal synthesis of zeolite-P using residual waste from indirect carbonation, conducted at both 100 and 180 ℃. The properties of these zeolites are compared with those synthesized from coal fly ash (CFA). The synthesized zeolites were characterized by X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscope, thermogravimetric analyzer, and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET). A high zeolite conversion efficiency was achieved through a hydrothermal reaction (up to 87%), even though Si and Al were not added to the residual waste. Additionally, the cation exchange capacity and BET specific surface area of the synthesized zeolites were high (200 cmol kg−1 and 73 m2 g−1, respectively). These findings highlight the possibility of synthesizing zeolites using the residual waste from indirect carbonation as an alternative to conventional zeolite synthesis using industrial waste such as CFA. The synthesized zeolite-P is expected to be effective in wastewater treatment, detergent manufacturing, and water softening.

1 Introduction

Zeolites have a three-dimensional structure comprising Al, O, Si, other alkali metals (Na and K), and H2O molecules [1]. They are porous materials with a large surface area and have cavities arranged in an aluminosilicate hydrate framework with a negative charge. Over the past few decades, the demand for zeolites has significantly increased owing to their emerging applications in various fields including catalysis, adsorption, water softening, wastewater treatment, and agriculture. Approximately 150 different synthetic zeolites are currently synthesized worldwide, which account for a total annual zeolite production of approximately 3 Mt [2]. The global zeolite market, which was valued at USD 4326 million in 2019, has been projected to be worth USD 6190 million in 2027 [2]. However, significant challenges such as the production cost of synthetic zeolites and logistical constraints exist in this arena [2, 3]. Commercially, zeolites are produced from chemical precursors such as NaAlO2 and Na2SiO3, making them considerably expensive. Therefore, alternative zeolite synthesis routes featuring reliable and economical source materials such as coal fly ash (CFA) [1, 4], red mud [5], and kaolin [6, 7] have been studied. The synthesis of zeolites using industrial waste containing abundant Si and Al instead of pure chemical reagents can assist in improving economic efficiency and reducing environmental pollution.

In this study, experiments were conducted to synthesize zeolites using the residual waste obtained via indirect carbonation of CFA—a coal combustion waste. Indirect carbonation is a technology for producing stable CaCO3 and MgCO3, which involves extracting Ca and Mg from industrial waste or natural minerals using solvents, such as acids and ammonium salts, and then reacting them with CO2 [6,7,8]. Although indirect carbonation shows promise as a carbon–neutral technology for CO2 storage, it is disadvantageous in terms of its questionable economic feasibility and landfill utilization for residual waste. Substantial residual waste is generated after the solvent-based extraction of Ca and Mg from industrial waste. Valuable components of the residual waste (i.e., Si and Al), which are present in industrial waste, remain intact but are landfilled. Notably, although the Ca and Mg contents of the residual waste are low, the contents of valuable elements such as Si and Al are often high. To the best of our knowledge, few studies have been conducted to date on recycling the residual waste from indirect carbonation.

CFA has previously been used as a material for indirect carbonation owing to its high Ca content as well as zeolite synthesis because of its high Si and Al contents [2, 9,10,11,12]. CFA is a highly abundant industrial solid waste used for zeolite synthesis. Moreover, it is an excellent waste material for synthesizing meso- and microporous materials because of its similar chemical composition and physicochemical properties to those of zeolite [2, 9, 10]. Although zeolite and CFA have similar elemental compositions, they differ in terms of their crystalline structure.

In terms of chemical composition, CFA primarily contains silica, alumina, ferrous oxide, and calcium oxide, along with different amounts of residual carbon and trace elements. However, significant inter- and intra-regional differences exist with respect to the composition [13]. The chemical composition of CFA varies with location, the type of coal burned, burning conditions, and the origin of the parent coal. The composition and mineralogical phase content of CFA are principally influenced by the origin and type of coal burned in power plants. Generally, the CFA derived from sub-bituminous and lignite coals is characterized by higher CaO, MgO, and SO3 contents and lower SiO2 and Al2O3 amounts than those of higher-grade fuels such as bituminous and anthracite coals [14].

The hydrothermal technique is considered the primary route for synthesizing zeolites using CFA. In this technique, water and a base are used as a solvent and mineralizer, respectively, at various temperatures and pressures. Zeolites are frequently synthesized using the hydrothermal approach owing to its advantages such as low energy consumption, high reactant reactivity, straightforward maintenance of the solution, low air pollution, and formation of metastable phases and unique condensed phases [13]. In hydrothermal treatment, the amount of aluminate or silicate is typically varied to obtain a desired type of zeolite. Different synthetic zeolites such as zeolite X, zeolite P, zeolite A, analcime, chabazite, and hydroxyl sodalite can be produced by altering reaction conditions such as temperature (80–200 C), reaction time (2–48 h), Si/Al ratio (1–15), alkaline solution concentration, pH, and seeding of initial CFA [15, 16].

In this study, we synthesized crystalline zeolite-P through a hydrothermal reaction using the residual waste produced after indirect carbonation to improve the economic feasibility of indirect carbonation technology and to implement a zero-discharge system. Zeolites were synthesized via the hydrothermal reaction of CFA-derived residual waste at low and high temperatures (100 and 180 C), and their properties were compared with those of zeolites obtained via the hydrothermal reaction of CFA. Additionally, the conversion efficiencies of the synthesized zeolites were determined by comparing the dehydration weight loss of synthesized zeolite and pure zeolite [15].

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

CFA obtained from a thermal power plant in Korea was used as an indirect carbonation material. The CFA particles were ≤ 425 μm in size. The following analytical-grade chemicals were used in the experiments: ammonium chloride (98.5%), hydrochloric acid (36.0%), and sodium hydroxide (97.0%). X-ray diffraction (XRD; SmartLab, Rigaku, Japan) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF; XRF-1700, Shimadzu, Japan) analyses were conducted to determine the components and properties of solid samples. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; MIRA-3, Tescan, Czech Republic) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA; TGA 7, Perkin Elmer, USA) were performed to examine the surface morphology of the solids and determine the temperature-dependent weight loss, respectively. For the TGA, each sample was placed on a Pt plate and heated from 50 to 900 C at 20°C min−1 to measure its weight change. The specific surface area of the solids was measured using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method (Autosorb-iQ, Quantachrome, USA).

2.2 Experimental methods

2.2.1 Zeolite synthesis using residual waste

First, the residual waste from indirect carbonation was prepared as a raw material to synthesize zeolites. CFA and an indirect carbonation solvent (0.3 M HCl or 0.3 M NH4Cl) were mixed at a ratio of 1:50 (g:mL) and stirred at 250 rpm for 1 h. The solvents have been commonly used in previous studies on indirect carbonation [8,9,10, 16,17,18,19,20]. The solids obtained by filtering the resulting suspension were dried. The products obtained using HCl and NH4Cl—referred to as ‘residual waste’ herein—are denoted as RW-HCl and RW-NH4Cl, respectively.

The zeolite synthesis is described henceforth. The two residual waste specimens were separately mixed with a 2 M NaOH solution at a ratio of 1:5 (g:mL) and then aged by stirring at 250 rpm at room temperature for 4 h. The resulting suspensions were hydrothermally reacted at 100 C for 24 h while stirring at 250 rpm and then filtered. The obtained solids were dried at 90 C for 12 h. The hydrothermal synthesis was also performed at 180 C. Additionally, zeolites were hydrothermally synthesized using CFA at 100 and 180 ℃ in the same manner. The synthesized zeolites—denoted as ZE-CFA-100, ZE-HCl-100, ZE-NH4Cl-100, ZE-CFA-180, ZE-HCl-180, and ZE-NH4Cl-180— were analyzed by XRD, XRF, TGA, and FE-SEM.

2.3 Adsorption properties of the synthesized zeolites

The cation-exchange capacity (CEC) and BET specific surface area were measured to evaluate the adsorption capacity of the zeolites hydrothermally synthesized at 100 and 180 C, and these values were compared with those of the raw materials (RW-NH4Cl, RW-HCl, and CFA). The CEC was determined using the ammonium method (EPA test method 9081).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Zeolite synthesis using residual waste

The Si and Al contents of the CFA were 58 and 18%, respectively, which were considerably higher than those of the other components; the Si/Al ratio was 3.2. The Si and Al contents of the residual waste were 58–60% and 21–24%, respectively, which were higher than those of the CFA; the Si/Al ratio was 2.3–2.8. The Si/Al ratios of both the CFA and residual waste were appropriate; therefore, additional aluminum or silicate was not required to synthesize zeolite P [19,20,21].

XRD analysis indicated that the primary components of both the residual waste and CFA were quartz (SiO2) and mullite [3(Al2O3)·2(SiO2)] (Fig. 1a–c), which are precursors of hydrothermally synthesized zeolites and can act as sources of Si and Al, respectively. FE-SEM images of the residual waste and CFA revealed their spherical shape and smooth surfaces that hardly had any pores (Fig. 2a–c).

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD patterns of raw materials and synthesized zeolites: a CFA, b RW-HCl, c RW-NH4Cl, d ZE-CFA-100, e ZE-HCl-100, (f) ZE-NH4Cl-100, g ZE-CFA-180, h ZE-HCl-180, and i ZE-NH4Cl-180. (: quartz, : mullite, : zeolite P)

Fig. 2
figure 2

FE-SEM images of raw materials and synthesized zeolites: a CFA, b RW-HCl, c RW-NH4Cl, d ZE-CFA-100, e ZE-HCl-100, f ZE-NH4Cl-100, g ZE-CFA-180, h ZE-HCl-180, and i ZE-NH4Cl-180

The solids obtained via hydrothermal synthesis at 100 and 180 C were confirmed to be zeolite P through their XRD patterns (Fig. 1d–i). P-type zeolites are known to belong to the gismondine family and exhibit unique characteristics [13]. In particular, zeolite P can be used for wastewater treatment and agriculture. To construct the zeolite structure during the hydrothermal process, the Si and Al components of the residual waste and CFA must be dissolved in a solution first; the aging process plays a vital role in this regard [22]. During the aging process conducted for more than 4 h in the present study, the Si and Al from quartz and mullite were dissolved in NaOH solution to form water-soluble sodium aluminosilicate. As a result, the aging conducted in the alkaline solution prior to the hydrothermal reaction promoted the zeolite synthesis [23, 24].

The XRD peak intensities of the zeolites synthesized at 180 C (54,000–60,000 counts; Fig. 1g–i) were approximately 1.5 times higher than those of the zeolites synthesized at 100 C (34,000–53,000 counts; Fig. 1d–f). The overall crystallinity and content of synthetic zeolites increase with increasing hydrothermal temperature [25]. The differences between the zeolites formed at different temperatures can be ascribed to the properties of mullite—a mixture of silicon and aluminum oxide—which is more stable than quartz—a silicon oxide. Because of the low solubility and inertness of mullite, the zeolite formation could be limited depending on the synthesis conditions [14]. In other words, the hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites using residual waste and CFA could have disadvantages such as the partial dissolution of Si and a lower dissolution rate of Al than that of Si at 100 C.

FE-SEM images of the synthesized zeolites (Fig. 2d–i) revealed a significantly higher number of pores in the synthesized zeolites than those in the raw materials (i.e., the residual waste and CFA). The zeolites hydrothermally synthesized at 100 C had a cactus-like spherical shape with many flat parts on their surfaces (Fig. 2d–f). In contrast, the zeolites synthesized at 180 C were irregularly shaped and had a coral-like morphology with extremely rough surfaces (Fig. 2g–i). Notably, the zeolites synthesized at 180 C had larger surface areas than those of the zeolites synthesized at 100 C. Depending on the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio and other synthesis conditions, zeolite P exhibits different morphologies such as cylindrical, rectangular-prism-shaped, donut-like, fiber-like, diamond-like, cactus-like, nut-like, cabbage-like, and wool-ball-like morphologies [20].

Table 1 lists the XRF results of the zeolites hydrothermally synthesized at 180 C. Compared to the Na2O contents of the raw materials (0.98–1.13%), those of the synthesized zeolites increased significantly to 9.8–11.5%. The molecular formula of the synthesized zeolite-P calculated using the XRF results was Na6Al6.9–7.9Si12.3–16.9, whose Na:Al:Si molar ratio is relatively close to that of the theoretical formula (Na6Al6Si10O32•12H2O; identified by XRD) [20]. Impurities other than the zeolites possibly existed in the hydrothermally synthesized solids because the suspension (raw materials and NaOH solution) was hydrothermalized without removing any impurities after the suspension was aged.

Table 1 Molecular formulae of the synthesized zeolites calculated using the XRF results

The Si/Al ratio of zeolites influences their adsorption properties. Low-silica zeolites (Si/Al < 2) have high ion-exchange capacity and can be used to adsorb ammonium and heavy metals [2, 26]. This is applicable to the zeolites synthesized using residual waste at 180 C in this study, as their Si/Al ratio was 1.8–1.9 (Table 1). Note that the Si/Al ratio of the zeolites synthesized using residual waste is lower than that of ZE-CFA-180 and seemingly within the desirable limit, indicating superior applicability.

3.2 Zeolite conversion efficiency

Figure 3 shows the TGA results of the six zeolites synthesized using the residual waste and CFA and that of pure zeolite-P synthesized using Na2SiO3 and NaAlO2 [27]. The TGA results were used to calculate the conversion efficiencies of the six zeolites. According to [15], the conversion efficiency of synthesized zeolites can be reliably calculated by TGA compared to other analytical methods. When a zeolite is heated, weight loss occurs owing to moisture loss at 40–400 C. Specifically, the loss of physically adsorbed moisture present in the zeolite pores occurs at 40–200 C, and the loss of moisture in the hydration complex formed using exchangeable cations occurs at 200–400°C [28]. In the temperature range 40–400 C, the zeolites hydrothermally synthesized at 100 and 180 C exhibited weight losses of 12.0–15.5% and 16.0–16.5%, respectively; pure zeolite-P showed a weight loss of 18.5% (Table S1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

TGA results of pure zeolite-P and the zeolites synthesized at 100 and 180 C

The conversion efficiency (%) was calculated by dividing the weight loss of the synthesized zeolite by that of pure zeolite P and multiplying by 100. The conversion efficiencies of the zeolites hydrothermally synthesized at 100 and 180 C were 65–84% and 87–89%, respectively; essentially, the zeolites exhibited a higher conversion efficiency at higher hydrothermal temperatures (Table 2). Notably, the zeolites hydrothermally synthesized at 180 C using only the residual waste and CFA without additional Si and Al exhibited high conversion efficiencies of up to 89%, with little difference observed in the zeolite conversion efficiency between the residual waste and CFA. These results suggest that both the residual waste from indirect carbonation as well as CFA, which has been extensively used to synthesize zeolites can be used to synthesize high-performance zeolites.

Table 2 Conversion efficiencies of zeolites synthesized using CFA and residual waste at 100 and 180 C

3.3 Adsorption properties of zeolites

Table 3 lists the CECs of the raw materials and synthesized zeolites. The CECs of the residual waste and CFA were similar and considerably low (4.8–5.3 cmol kg−1). These values are similar to those of previously investigated CFA [29, 30]. Moreover, the CECs of the zeolites synthesized at 180 C (178–200 cmol kg−1) were approximately three times higher than those of their counterparts synthesized at 100 C (46–57 cmol kg−1). Despite using the same aging process to synthesize the zeolites, the CEC of the zeolites increased with increasing hydrothermal temperature. The CEC of the zeolite P synthesized at 180 °C is similar to those reported previously (Table S2) [31,32,33,34]. The significantly high CEC of the zeolites synthesized at 180 °C indicates their potential effectiveness in fields such as pollutant removal and water softening.

Table 3 CECs of the raw materials and synthesized zeolites

Table 4 lists the BET specific surface areas of the raw materials and synthesized zeolites; those of the zeolites synthesized at 100 and 180 C were 30–72 m2 g−1 and 72–87 m2 g−1, respectively. The BET specific surface area of the zeolites increased with increasing hydrothermal temperature, similar to the CEC–temperature trend. The BET specific surface areas of the zeolites synthesized at 180 C (72–87 m2 g−1) were 12–26 times higher than those of the residual waste and CFA. These results are consistent with the surface characteristics observed through FE-SEM (Fig. 2) in terms of the surface-related differences between the smooth raw materials (residual waste and CFA) and the pore-rich and pointed synthetic zeolites. The specific surface areas of the zeolite P synthesized using residual waste and CFA were similar to or higher than those previously reported. For instance, in previous studies, the BET specific surface area of zeolite P synthesized using CFA via hydrothermal curing and aging is 19–88 m2 g−1 (Table S3) [19, 20, 30, 32,33,34,35].

Table 4 BET specific surface areas of the raw materials and synthesized zeolites

4 Conclusions

In this study, zeolite P was hydrothermally synthesized at 100 and 180 C using the residual waste from indirect carbonation without adding Si or Al. The zeolites hydrothermally synthesized at 180 C had higher CECs and larger specific surface areas than those of their counterparts synthesized at 100 C. Moreover, the CECs of the zeolites synthesized at 180 C (189–200 cmol kg−1) were 36–39 times higher than those of the residual waste, while their BET specific surface areas (72–73 m2 g−1) were 12–16 times higher. The conversion efficiency of the zeolites synthesized at 180 C was remarkably high (87%), emphasizing the suitability of the residual waste as a material for zeolite synthesis. This approach on utilizing residual waste offers several advantages such as mitigating the disposal of substantial waste in landfills, which can lead to significant environmental and financial benefits. Additionally, materials with superior ion exchange and adsorption properties can be obtained through residual-waste-based zeolite synthesis. The zeolite-P hydrothermally synthesized using indirect-carbonation-derived residual waste could be used to remove pollutants, including heavy metals, ammonium ions, and toxic and radioactive waste species; extract potassium from seawater; and soften water. The use of residual waste from indirect carbonation can open new horizons for enabling the economical synthesis of zeolites, being promising for use in many applications and fields. Future work will involve extensive research on the production of calcium carbonate through indirect carbonation, while synthesizing zeolite using the residual waste generated during this process. An economic assessment of the entire process will be also conducted together with quantitative determination of the CO2 stored and energy consumed.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Yadav VK, Choudhary N, Tirth V, Kalasariya H, Gnanamoorthy G, Algahtani A, et al. A short review on the utilization of incense sticks ash as an emerging and overlooked material for the synthesis of zeolites. Crystals. 2021;11:1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Szerement J, Szatanik-Kloc A, Jarosz R, Bajda T, Mierzwa-Hersztek M. Contemporary applications of natural and synthetic zeolites from fly ash in agriculture and environmental protection. J Clean Prod. 2021;311:127461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karmen M, Anamarija F. Introductory chapter: Zeolites - From discovery to new applications on the global market. In: Karmen M, Anamarija F, editors. Zeolites - New Challenges. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2020, p. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Langauer D, Cablik V, Hredzak S, Zubrik A, Matik M, Dankova Z. Preparation of synthetic zeolites from coal fly ash by hydrothermal synthesis. Materials. 2021;14:1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Samal S. Utilization of red mud as a source for metal ions—A review. Materials. 2021;14:2211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanna A, Uibu M, Caramanna G, Kuusik R, Maroto-Valer MM. A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO2. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:8049–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Azdarpour A, Asadullah M, Mohammadian E, Hamidi H, Junin R, Karaei MA. A review on carbon dioxide mineral carbonation through pH-swing process. Chem Eng J. 2015;279:615–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Woodall CM, McQueen N, Pilorge H, Wilcox J. Utilization of mineral carbonation products: current state and potential. Greenh Gases. 2019;9:1096–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bandura L, Woszuk A, Kołodynska D, Franus W. Application of mineral sorbents for removal of petroleum substances: A review. Minerals. 2017;7:37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Woszuk A, Zofka A, Bandura L, Franus W. Effect of zeolite properties on asphalt foaming. Constr Build Mater. 2017;139:247–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho HJ, Iizuka A, Shibata E, Ojumu T. Circular indirect carbonation of coal fly ash for carbon dioxide capture and utilization. J Environ Chem Eng. 2022;10:108269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blissett RS, Rowson NA. A review of the multi-component utilisation of coal fly ash. Fuel. 2012;97:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khaleque A, Alam MM, Hoque M, Mondal S, Haider JB, Xu B, et al. Zeolite synthesis from low-cost materials and environmental applications: A review. Environ Adv. 2020;2:100019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tauanov Z, Azat S, Baibatyrova A. A mini-review on coal fly ash properties, utilization and synthesis of zeolites. Int J Coal Prep Util. 2022;42:1968–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Majchrzak-Kucęba I. A simple thermogravimetric method for the evaluation of the degree of fly ash conversion into zeolite material. J Porous Mat. 2013;20:407–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim MJ, Pak SY, Kim D, Jung S. Optimum conditions for extracting Ca from CKD to store CO2 through indirect mineral carbonation. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2017;21:629–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim D, Kim MJ. Calcium extraction from paper sludge ash using various solvents to store carbon dioxide. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2018;22:4799–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim MJ, Kim D. Maximization of CO2 storage for various solvent types in indirect carbonation using paper sludge ash. Environ Sci Pollut R. 2018;25:30101–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aldahri T, Behin J, Kazemian H, Rohani S. Synthesis of zeolite Na-P from coal fly ash by thermo-sonochemical treatment. Fuel. 2016;182:494–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Y, Yan C, Zhao J, Zhang Z, Wang H, Zhou S, et al. Synthesis of zeolite P1 from fly ash under solvent-free conditions for ammonium removal from water. J Clean Prod. 2018;202:11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang P, Sun Q, Zhang Y, Cao J. Hydrothermal synthesis of magnetic zeolite P from fly ash and its properties. Mater Res Express. 2020;7:016104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao XS, Lu GQ, Zhu HY. Effects of ageing and seeding on the formation of zeolite Y from coal fly ash. J Porous Mat. 1997;4:245–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Anuwattana R, Khummongkol P. Conventional hydrothermal synthesis of Na-A zeolite from cupola slag and aluminum sludge. J Hazard Mater. 2009;166:227–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kamimura Y, Itabashi K, Okubo T. Seed-assisted, OSDA-free synthesis of MTW-type zeolite and “Green MTW” from sodium aluminosilicate gel systems. Micropor Mesopor Mat. 2012;147:149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Murayama N, Yamamoto H, Shibata J. Mechanism of zeolite synthesis from coal fly ash by alkali hydrothermal reaction. Int J Miner Process. 2002;64:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Munthali MW, Elsheikh MA, Johan E, Matsue N. Proton adsorption selectivity of zeolites in aqueous media: Effect of Si/Al ratio of zeolites. Molecules. 2014;19:20468–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huo Z, Xu X, Lu Z, Song J, He M, Li Z, et al. Synthesis of zeolite NaP with controllable morphologies. Micropor Mesopor Mat. 2012;158:137–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Musyoka NM, Petrik LF, Hums E, Kuhnt A, Schwieger W. Thermal stability studies of zeolites A and X synthesized from South African coal fly ash. Res Chem Intermediat. 2015;41:575–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Apiratikul R, Pavasant P. Sorption of Cu2+, Cd2+, and Pb2+ using modified zeolite from coal fly ash. Chem Eng J. 2008;144:245–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Izidoro JC, Fungaro DA, dos Santos FS, Wang S. Characteristics of Brazilian coal fly ashes and their synthesized zeolites. Fuel Process Technol. 2012;97:38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Johan E, Yamada T, Munthali MW, Kabwadza-Corner P, Aono H, Matsue N. Natural zeolites as potential materials for decontamination of radioactive cesium. Procedia Environ Sci. 2015;28:52–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Goscianska J, Ptaszkowska-Koniarz M, Frankowski M, Franus M, Panek R, Franus W. Removal of phosphate from water by lanthanum-modified zeolites obtained from fly ash. J Colloid Interf Sci. 2018;513:72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Aldahri T, Behin J, Kazemian H, Rohani S. Effect of microwave irradiation on crystal growth of zeolitized coal fly ash with different solid/liquid ratios. Adv Powder Technol. 2017;28:2865–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Qiu X, Liu Y, Li D, Yan C. Preparation of NaP zeolite block from fly ash-based geopolymer via in situ hydrothermal method. J Porous Mat. 2015;22:291–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Franus W, Wdowin M, Franus M. Synthesis and characterization of zeolites prepared from industrial fly ash. Environ Monit Assess. 2014;186:5721–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea grant funded by the Korean government (NRF-2021R1A2C2009914). This research was supported by Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (20220149).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Seonmi Shin: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing − original draft. Myoung-Jin Kim: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myoung-Jin Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Weight loss (%) of synthesized zeolites at 40–400 °C. Table S2. Cation-exchange capacities (CECs) of previously reported zeolites. Table S3. BET specific surface areas of previously reported zeolites.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, S., Kim, MJ. Hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites from residual waste generated via indirect carbonation of coal fly ash. Sustain Environ Res 34, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-023-00206-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-023-00206-6

Keywords